Today over on the Motherboard website is a nice article on little kennie ham's latest folly, "A Visit to 'Ark Encounter', Where Creationism and Dinosaurs Collide", by Taylor Dorrell. Little kennie won't like it for a couple of reasons.
First of all, the most obvious reason, is because Taylor didn't bend a knee and give kennie the homage he seems to expect. To kennie, the world is a binary set of people, those who agree completely with him and everyone else. The simple fact that 'everyone else' is a huge majority doesn't matter much to kennie, he's convinced in his own righteousness. Even if you are a member of one of the many similar religious groups -- if you aren't a member of kennie's, you aren't.
Taylor obviously is not. Instead of simply re-iterating all the things kennie has said about his latest ministry, Taylor wrote honestly about his visit. I'm not convinced honesty is a word that comes up often where kennie is concerned. Here's a great quote:
"After experiencing both the Creation Museum and the Ark, I’ve concluded that most of the people visiting are very nice, but I see [Neil DeGrasse] Tyson’s concern with teaching children stories as fact: Ken Ham’s arguments against the Earth being billions of years old rely on the inconsistency of radiometric dating; he doesn’t believe that the light from far away stars and galaxies take billions of years to reach the Earth. When making these arguments, he’s quoting the Bible, not science or any discovery or data in the modern world, as a viable source."As you can see Taylor sees one of my own issues, the education of our children. I saw it when I visited kennie's other ministry, the poorly named Creation 'museum' in 2009. It wasn't so much the adults wandering around looking like they were about to genuflect every three steps, it was listening to the adults 'explain' the exhibits to their children that was positively frightening.
The other reason little kennie might not like this article can be summed up with one little quote:
"I went on the first Sunday it was opened, expecting a large crowd. However there were very few visitors."
So I can safely assume kennie will comment on this article, if he can find it among all the other negative articles about the ark park. I'm sure kennie will accuse the writer of something like being an atheist of some sort, without a clue to his actual religious beliefs. Obviously kennie isn't responsible for the falling attendance of his 'museum' and the apparent poor attendance of his phony replica . . . well what would you call it? How can you make a replica of a non-existent ship? A model maybe, but calling it a replica means that there had to have been an original. In any event, kennie will find others to blame and if if gets worse, he will get to dump the bill on Kentucky and probably remind us how God told him to do it.
OK, enough of this, I am sure there will be more articles in the future, but the activity does seem to be dying down. I used to get 5 or 6 links to articles about the ark park every day, It's slowed to a maybe 2 a week, apparently it's falling just like it's attendance.